Indigenous families are grossly overrepresented in birth alerts in B.C. Photo of reporter Anna McKenzie and her daughter taken by Captured Memories Photography. Bayleigh Marelj, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

Indigenous families are grossly overrepresented in birth alerts in B.C. Photo of reporter Anna McKenzie and her daughter taken by Captured Memories Photography. Bayleigh Marelj, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

B.C. ministry warned birth alerts ‘illegal and unconstitutional’ months before banning them

Indigenous families are grossly overrepresented in birth alerts in B.C.

By Anna McKenzie, Bayleigh Marelj and Brielle Morgan, Local Journalism Initiative Reporters, The Discourse

Months before British Columbia officially ended the controversial practice of birth alerts, government lawyers advised the Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) that the practice was “illegal and unconstitutional” and posed a “litigation risk,” according to records obtained by IndigiNews.

When a social worker feels an expectant parent may put their newborn at risk, they can issue a “birth alert” or a “hospital alert,” flagging the expectant parent to hospital staff without their consent, and directing them to notify social workers as soon as the baby’s born.

MCFD records show that B.C.’s Ministry of Attorney General sent a memo to the ministry on May 6, 2019, confirming that “the use of hospital alerts, and other activities involving the disclosure of information without the consent of expectant parents is both illegal and unconstitutional.”

But the B.C. government didn’t ban birth alerts until months later, on Sept. 16, 2019.

If birth alerts aren’t legal, this could have important implications for the hundreds, if not thousands, of families across Canada that have been impacted by them.

“It has required intense advocacy to get the health care systems to end this unlawful practice. In the meantime, the unlawful and harmful device has broken up families, created barriers in health care, and disrupted proper positive relationships supporting parents and children,” says Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond.

The law professor and judge served as B.C.’s Representative for Children and Youth (RCY), an independent advocacy and oversight body, from 2006 to 2016. She also led a recent investigation into the rampant anti-Indigenous racism in B.C.’s healthcare system.

“Apologies and amends are necessary, as there has been harm done, including promoting the stereotypes that Indigenous families require intense surveillance because they cannot safely care for their own children,” wrote Turpel-Lafond in an email to IndigiNews.

MCFD flagged birth alerts as a ‘litigation risk’

Indigenous leaders across the country have long been calling for an end to birth alerts.

“Birth alerts are racist and discriminatory and are a gross violation of the rights of the child, the mother, and the community,” wrote the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls in its final report, published on June 3, 2019.

The inquiry called for “an immediate end to the practice of targeting and apprehending infants (hospital alerts or birth alerts) from Indigenous mothers right after they give birth.”

In B.C., birth alerts result in child apprehension, or the removal of the newborn from their mothers, “approximately 28% of the time,” according to an MCFD record from 2019.

Former Representative for Children and Youth, Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond. Photo by Brielle Morgan.

Former Representative for Children and Youth, Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond. Photo by Brielle Morgan.

MCFD records show that there were at least 444 birth alerts in B.C. between Jan. 1, 2018 and Aug. 31, 2019. And Indigenous people are disproportionately impacted by these alerts. For example, 58 per cent of parents impacted by birth alerts in B.C. in 2018 were Indigenous, according to MCFD’s data.

When former MCFD minister Katrine Conroy announced that MCFD was ending birth alerts, she said this decision was informed by the inquiry’s recommendation, as well as calls from Indigenous communities and organizations.

But pressure from Indigenous leaders may not have been the only factor in MCFD’s decision making.

Records show that the government was concerned that social workers were breaching parents’ privacy rights by sharing their personal information with hospital staff without first getting their consent.

“Disclosure of information to third parties without an expectant parents’ consent is not authorised under the [Child, Family and Community Service Act] and is a violation of the expectant parents’ Charter Rights,” reads a note prepared for senior staff at MCFD in August 2019.

Birth alerts were flagged as a “litigation risk” months before putting a stop to them.

“Although there has been no legal action taken in B.C. since the practice of hospital alerts began, this may create a future litigation risk,” reads a memo prepared for Conroy on June 28, 2019.

IndigiNews sent interview requests to B.C.’s Attorney General and MCFD, but these requests were denied.

IndigiNews instead received a letter on Jan. 8, 2021, from a lawyer acting on behalf of MCFD, requesting that IndigiNews “return the entire records package” and to “refrain from retaining or disseminating those records or its contents in any way.”

According to the letter, the ministry released information about legal concerns related to birth alerts “in error.”

Mother’s complaint about birth alert ‘substantiated’

At least one parent in B.C. has complained that her privacy was breached by virtue of a birth alert — and this complaint was investigated and substantiated by B.C.’s Ministry of Citizens’ Services (MCS).

This parent alleged, according to internal records, that “MCFD had collected, used and disclosed her personal information without her consent or authorization, and these actions resulted in the removal of the complainant’s infant from her custody in October 2017.”

MCS investigated this mother’s complaint and determined it was valid. In August 2019, the parent was advised in writing that their “complaint was substantiated.”

When asked what steps were taken after substantiating the complaint, MCFD declined to comment.

“While we can’t speak about case-specific matters, the Ministry of Citizens’ Services investigates all allegations of privacy breaches. The investigative process is set out in policy and followed diligently in order to ensure that all appropriate actions are taken,” wrote a spokesperson for the ministry.

“We also provided information about the investigation to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner,” they added.

IndigiNews reached out to Micheal McEvoy, B.C.’s Information and Privacy Commissioner, for comment.

“The Commissioner is not in a position to provide an interview,” said a spokesperson via email.

“Our office has looked at this issue, and it is our view that the practice of ‘birth alerts’ is not authorized by FIPPA [B.C.’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act]. We have confirmed with the Ministry that ‘birth alerts’ are no longer conducted.”

Parents may not know their privacy was breached by a birth alert — because MCFD hasn’t told them

Hundreds, if not thousands, of parents have been the subject of potentially “illegal and unconstitutional” birth alerts — but do they know that?

In order to complain that your privacy was breached by virtue of a birth alert, you have to know that the ministry issued a birth alert with respect to you and your baby.

According to MCFD, the ministry hasn’t let parents know that it breached their privacy by issuing a birth alert against them.

“Our focus since we ended the practice of birth alerts has been forward looking. We didn’t want to retraumatize affected families by providing notifications of past birth alerts,” wrote a spokesperson to IndigiNews. “Our goal was to ensure the safety of children by ensuring the family had the supports they needed to keep kids safe.”

The ministry is not legally required to notify parents if it breached their privacy. And this is a sore spot for B.C.’s privacy commissioner, according to an emailed statement from the commissioner’s spokesperson.

“BC’s FIPPA’s legislation lacks any mandatory breach notification requirements,” wrote the spokesperson. “That is to say there is no legal obligation on the part of public bodies to report such breaches to our Office or to the individuals involved.

“This is a serious shortcoming in FIPPA and one the Commissioner has called on to be rectified where there exists a real risk of significant harm to an individual. A Special Committee to Review FIPPA will receive submissions later this year and the Commissioner will again repeat his call for these changes.”

As it stands, it’s up to MCFD’s discretion as to whether to notify parents when their privacy has been breached.

That said, according to MCFD’s records, MCS will make a recommendation to MCFD, and it generally recommends notification when the incident “caused harm to impacted individuals,” so they can “exercise their right to request a review of the circumstances by the [Office of the Privacy Commissioner].”

IndigiNews asked MCFD and the MCS whether the removal of a child or the threat of removal amounts to harm, in their view.

Neither ministry responded.

MCFD’s records also reveal that MCS “expressed a concern for the systemic nature of the privacy breach associated with hospital alerts which includes the number of potential complainants over the years hospital alerts were issued, and the sensitivity of the personal information shared without consent.”

Child welfare watchdogs respond

In B.C., the RCY’s mandate is to advocate on behalf of children and youth, including monitoring and reporting on services and conducting independent reviews of injuries and deaths of youth in care.

When IndigiNews asked current RCY Jennifer Charlesworth how she responds to the documents that discuss birth alerts as illegal and unconstitutional, she said: “You’re sharing information that I was not aware of.”

Charlesworth did not have anything further to add, stating that she is not a legal professional.

IndigiNews followed up, asking the RCY if they feel that parents whose privacy was breached by virtue of issuing a birth alert are owed anything. Having not seen the documents obtained by IndigiNews, they say that “any decision about potential damages or remedies to families would have to be made by the courts.”

Turpel-Lafond says that for a long time she’s taken the position, as an advocate and a law professor, that birth alerts are illegal.

“They give a lot of authority to the child welfare system, but I was never convinced that they gave authority to just, like, openly flag an entire health care system,” she says. “This is an area I’ve been really worried about in terms of trampling on the fundamental and human rights of Indigenous families.

“In some hospitals and social work teams, [they] were just defaulting to birth alerts and actually not working with moms.”

And even though birth alerts have been banned in B.C., their legacy endures, says Turpel-Lafond.

“This alert mechanism set a terrible course of mistreatment in the health care system,” she says. “I still see a lot of issues in the hospital setting, and there’s still a lot of stain in that system, like a lot of prejudice and ideas about First Nations people not being good parents.”

She’s concerned about the lasting impact of a birth alert on someone’s record.

“Since they’ve ended birth alerts, what have they done with the information that was in the system?”

While investigating anti-Indigenous racism in the health care system, Turpel-Lafond says she heard from Indigenous women who needed cancer treatment, but had trouble accessing it because they were “scarred” by past experiences in the system and “so damaged by the kinds of attitudes and opinions that are freely shared about them.”

As far as notifying parents whose privacy was breached by virtue of a birth alert, Turpel-Lafond can’t see an easy path forward. She says many Indigenous people aren’t likely to answer a call from the Ministry for Children and Families given the ministry’s damning history, and mailing a letter isn’t the most secure way of sharing such personal information.

“I do feel like the mess is not cleaned up,” says the judge. “Apologies and amends are necessary.”

Birth alerts are still being used elsewhere in Canada

Families across the country have been impacted by birth alerts, even though some provinces announced they were cancelling the practice in recent years.

In addition to B.C., Alberta “formally ceased this practice in 2019,” according to a note from a government spokesperson. Manitoba says they stopped birth alerts on July 1, 2020. Ontario committed to “eliminating the practice” by Oct. 15, 2020. Yukon “officially discontinued” the practice in 2019, noting that “the last time a child was taken into care after a ‘birth alert’ in Yukon was in 2017.” And according to a spokesperson for NWT, birth alerts haven’t been a practice in the territory for over a decade.

Meanwhile, birth alerts are still being used in Quebec, and social workers have been using them since 2009 according to a spokesperson for the province’s Ministry of Health and Social Services.

They’re also still being used in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador. But the practice is currently under review in all three provinces, according to statements from government spokespeople.

“When there is a high safety risk to an unborn baby and the family is not voluntarily working with the department, hospital(s) can be asked to alert the department of the birth of the child,” wrote a spokesperson for the Department of Children, Seniors and Social Development in Newfoundland and Labrador.

“However, as a result of recommendations in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Inquiry to end the practice of sending birth alerts to hospitals, this policy is currently under review.”

PEI aims to stop the practice by the end of this month, according to a spokesperson for its Department of Social Development and Housing.

IndigiNews did not receive a response from Nunavut before this story’s publication deadline.

Turpel-Lafond says that if birth alerts aren’t legally justified in B.C., the same would go for other jurisdictions.

“That wouldn’t just be confined to B.C., that would be anywhere in Canada,” she says.

A timeline of birth alerts in BC.

A timeline of birth alerts in BC.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Want to support local journalism? Make a donation here.

Indigenous

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Taylor Bachrach
Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP Taylor Bachrach.
Progress being made on infrastructure spending for Northwest: Bachrach

Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP says per capita funding is triple the provincial average

Public Land Fees have been waived. Originally $250 per season and $250 per parking stall made unusable; restaurants can now apply to pop-up patios free of charge. (Jacob Lubberts photo)
VIDEO: District of Kitimat waive patio fees for local businesses

These short-term measures will be determined on an individual basis

The Nechako Centre building was a retail space built in 1955. The building is now vacant and is listed for sale for $4.4Million. Sitting on 0.72 acres, the building is currently under a redevelopment/revitalization process. (Jacob Lubberts Photo)
Nechako Centre teardown in Kitimat for sale at $4.4 million

B.C. assessments valued the property at $843,000 with a land value of only $492,000

B.C. Finance Minister Selina Robinson outlines the province’s three-year budget in Victoria, April 20, 2021. (B.C. government video)
B.C. deficit to grow by $19 billion for COVID-19 recovery spending

Pandemic-year deficit $5 billion lower than forecast

Raising more than $1,300 for the KVHS’s dementia home project, Dennis and Brenda Horwood leave Kitimat with a bang and start their new retirement journey together. (Photo supplied)
KVHS thanks local Kitimat couple for their contributions to the dementia home project

Dennis and Brenda Horwood raise $1,360 during a retirement garage sale

Public Land Fees have been waived. Originally $250 per season and $250 per parking stall made unusable; restaurants can now apply to pop-up patios free of charge. (Jacob Lubberts photo)
VIDEO: District of Kitimat waive patio fees for local businesses

These short-term measures will be determined on an individual basis

Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General Mike Farnworth speaks to media at the Legislature in Victoria, B.C., on Monday February 5, 2018. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito
B.C. officials to announce travel restrictions today to limit COVID-19 spread

Mike Farnworth is expected to give details of what the government views as essential travel

Richard Desautel with supporters outside the courthouse in Nelson, B.C., in 2016. Photo: Bill Metcalfe
BREAKING: Sinixt, First Nation bordering Canada-U.S., can claim Indigenous rights, top court rules

The decision essentially reverses a 1956 declaration the Sinixt were extinct

MLA Shirley Bond, right, answers questions during a press conference at Legislature in Victoria, B.C., on February 19, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito
Former B.C. gaming minister says she wasn’t told directly about dirty cash flowing to casinos

Shirley Bond said Thursday civil forfeiture, gang violence and gambling addiction were also major concerns in 2011

RCMP Constable Etsell speaks to tourists leaving the area at a police roadblock on Westside Road south of Fintry, B.C., Thursday, July 23, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Yvonne Berg
B.C. police say they take ‘exception’ to conducting roadblocks limiting travel

Asking the police to enforce roadblocks exposes officers to further risk and possible COVID-19 infections, says federation president Brian Sauve

As part of the province’s strategy to combat the opioid overdose crisis, take-home naloxone kits have been distributed throughout the province. (Courtesy of Gaëlle Nicolussi)
Vancouver Island could be at its worst point of overdose crises yet: medical health officer

Island Health issued overdose advisories for Victoria, various communities in the last two weeks

BC Hydro released a survey Thursday, April 22. It found that many British Columbians are unintentionally contributing to climate change with their yard maintenance choices. (Pixabay)
Spend a lot of time doing yard work? It might be contributing to climate change

Recent BC Hydro survey finds 60% of homeowners still use gas-powered lawnmowers and yard equipment

Journal de Montreal is seen in Montreal, on Thursday, April 22, 2021. The daily newspaper uses a file picture of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau dressed in traditional Indian clothing during his trip to India to illustrate a story on the Indian variant of the coronavirus. Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press
Montreal newspaper blasted for front-page photo of Trudeau in India

Trudeau is wearing traditional Indian clothes and holding his hands together in prayer beside a caption that reads, ‘The Indian variant has arrived’

Most Read