A review of Kitimat’s development approvals process is underway, with early findings suggesting potential changes that could significantly impact how new housing and commercial projects move forward in the district.
At a special meeting on Feb. 24, council received an update from planning consultants Stantec, who have been assessing how efficiently development applications are processed and where improvements can be made. Their findings, which will inform a final report in May, could lead to streamlined approvals, updated public notification rules, and changes to development fees—measures aimed at making the system more predictable and responsive to demand.
“This is a great report,” said Mayor Phil Germuth. “It’s been a long time coming, and I’m looking forward to seeing this finalized to see how we can make this more efficient for developers and the district.”
The Development Approvals Process Review (DAPR) was commissioned by the district in 2024 with funding from a provincial grant provided through the Union of BC Municipalities. Chris Wilcott, a project planner, and Zoe Morrison, a community planner, both with Stantec, were on hand to present the findings.
The study, which is expected to conclude in May, has so far included a review of existing procedures, interviews with district staff and developers, and comparisons with other BC municipalities. Stantec’s analysis found that while Kitimat’s process generally aligns with other communities, some unique aspects, such as the ‘For Consideration’ and ‘For Information Only’ introduction reports and the role of the Advisory Planning Commission, set it apart.
District staff were noted for their cooperative approach and in-depth knowledge of the planning process, with Stantec acknowledging their role in identifying both strengths and areas for improvement. However, staff also pointed out inconsistencies in the official review process, largely due to management turnover in recent years.
The study found that while Kitimat’s public notification system generally works well, there is room for improvement. Interviewees suggested that notification requirements should vary based on the scale of a project, with larger developments potentially requiring wider outreach. A more standardized approach, including clearer application guides and signage requirements for major projects, was among the recommendations.
Fees and charges were another area flagged for review. Kitimat’s development application fees are among the lowest compared to other surveyed municipalities and have not been updated in 12 years. Stantec’s report suggests that council consider adjusting fees to reflect a balance between cost recovery and maintaining affordability for developers.
Developers who participated in the study, though unnamed for confidentiality reasons, provided positive feedback on the district’s planning department, particularly the accessibility of staff and the informal pre-application process. However, they noted challenges in maintaining consistency in application reviews, particularly when staff changes occur mid-process. Concerns were also raised about the volume of application forms required and the lack of an online tracking system.
As the review moves into its final phase, Stantec will develop recommendations for streamlining approvals, updating public notification requirements, and potentially delegating certain approvals to staff to expedite the process. The final report is expected to be presented to council in spring.
Council’s debate on whether to implement the recommendations will follow.
