Council has voted unanimously to develop a training and certification program for potential belay wall users before proceeding with a feasibility study on the proposed project. The feasibility study funding will be considered in the 2026 budget deliberations, but only once the certification program is in place to ensure the facility can be operated safely and effectively.
"We’re not allocating a tonne of money and resources yet on this specific motion. We’re really just taking the next steps," said Councillor Michelle Martins, noting that a climbing wall could provide a unique, year-round recreation option.
A public engagement survey conducted between Dec. 16 and Jan. 12 received 283 responses. While 62 per cent of respondents said they were at least somewhat likely to use a belay climbing wall, 31.8 per cent said they were very unlikely to use it.The community was also divided on whether the project should be a priority, with 45.58 per cent supporting it and 37.81 per cent in opposition.
The survey revealed concerns regarding cost, accessibility, and community priorities. Seventy-four per cent of respondents said they do not currently participate in belay climbing, with many arguing the funds could be better used for existing infrastructure, such as roads, playgrounds, the hockey rink, and the swimming pool. Others pointed out that Kitimat already has an underutilized climbing wall and questioned the need for another. A smaller group of respondents supported the project, citing potential benefits for youth, adults, and tourism. However, many residents suggested the district invest in other recreational options, such as a water park, daycare services, or an indoor soccer facility.
The preferred location remains undecided, as both Tamitik and Riverlodge have advantages and challenges. In June 2024, staff initially asked whether the wall would be better suited for Riverlodge’s climbing room or the racquetball court at Tamitik. While Tamitik was identified as the obvious first choice due to its underused space, staff raised concerns about exposed fire lines, lack of a full enclosure, access issues, and the absence of a security system.
In contrast, Riverlodge would address these issues and has a pre-existing bouldering wall that the belay system could complement. The main drawback is the potential displacement of summer students who use the space from May to August. Despite these factors, the survey showed that 60.7 per cent preferred Tamitik, while 39.3 per cent favoured Riverlodge.
During discussions, Councillor Mario Feldhoff stressed the importance of having a dedicated group to lead the training and certification program for belay wall users. “We’re going to face challenges... the development of that program is extremely important. We may need to call upon members of the community who are really active in this [sport] to show some leadership in working with our staff,” he said.
Councillor Graham Pitzel, who initially supported the project, reconsidered after reviewing the survey results. “The more I think about it, the more I read about it, I think it might not be the best thing to undertake at this point,” he said, citing concerns about the cost of equipment, certification requirements, and maintenance. However, he ultimately supported the motion, as it ensures a phased approach that will provide more clarity before any funding decisions are made.
Acting Mayor Terry Marleau acknowledged the negative feedback from residents, raising concerns about budget constraints. “We have a difficult budget coming up,” he said, asking staff for cost estimates on the feasibility study and any potential future expenses.
Martin Gould, Director of Leisure Services, estimated that the engineering feasibility study would cost approximately $50,000. A previous estimate in June suggested construction could cost between $70,000 and $75,000, but Chief Administrative Officer Warren Waycheshen emphasized that the feasibility study cannot be conducted until the training and certification program is developed.
Staff have collected names of community members interested in leading the program, though external experts may be needed to establish the training and certification process. Any associated costs will be deferred to the 2026 budget, ensuring a measured approach before any construction decisions are made.
